CPATH-2026-0022 · Drone / autonomous systems

GPS/GNSS Spoofing Safe-Hijacking of Consumer Drones (Adaptive GPS Spoofing / Tractor Beam class)

Two or more co-dominant consequence paths connect the public security record to a provisional CRITICAL consequence band.

Candidate bandCRITICAL
Co-dominant pathsPerception-to-action + Device-control safety

These paths are co-dominant because each reaches the record's highest candidate band, CRITICAL; no array-order tie-break is applied.

Causal model

What has to happen for this consequence to hold?

2 candidate paths · explicit source, inference, and assumption boundaries.

Perception · Co-dominant path

Perception-to-action

Spoofed GNSS changes the position estimate trusted by the autopilot, causing the aircraft to act on a false navigation state.

CRITICAL
  1. accessModel inference

    Proximity or local access

    The attacker must transmit a stronger spoofed GNSS signal within radio range and line of sight; no network account or drone credential is required.

    EvidenceNo direct citation — inspect the declared inference or assumption.

  2. boundaryModel inference

    Cross-domain authority chain

    RF and physical to perception to control and safety domains.

    EvidenceNo direct citation — inspect the declared inference or assumption.

  3. capabilityModel inference

    Safety-driving perception or intimate data

    Spoofed GNSS changes the position estimate trusted by the autopilot, causing the aircraft to act on a false navigation state.

    EvidenceNo direct citation — inspect the declared inference or assumption.

  4. consequenceModel inference

    Perception-to-action

    Spoofed GNSS changes the position estimate trusted by the autopilot, causing the aircraft to act on a false navigation state.

    EvidenceNo direct citation — inspect the declared inference or assumption.

  5. recoveryOperational assumption

    Fleet action or replacement

    Fleet-wide recovery is required: root cause is unauthenticated L1 C and A.

    EvidenceNo direct citation — inspect the declared inference or assumption.

Decision rationale

Why this band?

The compact score is separated into the facts and judgments that produced it.

Reach and effort
ReachabilityRE 2
Proximity or local access

The attacker must transmit a stronger spoofed GNSS signal within radio range and line of sight; no network account or drone credential is required.

Model inference
Execution complexityEC 2
Specialist multi-step technique

Adaptive signal shaping requires specialist radio work, but multiple research groups reproduced it with commercial software-defined radio equipment.

Model inference
ExposureEX 2
Reach and effort support the same exposure

The documented reach and required effort are equally permissive, so neither reduces the other.

Model inference
Consequence
Physical / safetyPH 4
Severe therapy or actuation consequence

Forced fly-away, steering to attacker location, crash and forced landing are credible dangerous actuation.

Model inference
Data / perceptionDP 4
Safety-driving perception or intimate data

Spoofed GNSS changes the position estimate trusted by the autopilot, causing the aircraft to act on a false navigation state.

Model inference
AuthorityAT 2
Bounded function authority

No signing and firmware root or fleet control plane is captured.

Model inference
Scale and recovery
ChainabilityCH 4
Cross-domain authority chain

RF and physical to perception to control and safety domains.

Model inference
Reuse scaleSR 4
Shared fleet-wide primitive

Technique reuses against any unauthenticated civilian GNSS receiver (no per-device secret).

Operational assumption
Execution scaleSX 3
Deployment-wide with setup

One spoofer affects all in-range receivers, deployment and area-wide but requires RF setup and proximity, not remote cloud fleet.

Operational assumption
Recovery burdenOR 4
Fleet action or replacement

Fleet-wide recovery is required: root cause is unauthenticated L1 C and A.

Operational assumption
Confidence and status
Evidence strengthEV 3
Reproduced or strongly report-backed

source citation pending public URL supports a reproduced or strongly report-backed condition; this registry still keeps consequence review separate from exploit confirmation.

Model inference
LivenessLS Active
Active condition at scoring time

The public record did not establish a complete mitigation at scoring time; field exploitation is stated only where a cited source supports it.

Operational assumption

Decision trail

How the final band follows

  1. Base bandCRITICAL
  2. No adjustment

    The CRITICAL base band remains final because no separate cap or systemic uplift applies. Spoofed GNSS changes the position estimate trusted by the autopilot, causing the aircraft to act on a false navigation state.

  3. Final candidate bandCRITICAL
Technical vector
Compact machine notationCPATH:1.0-candidate/TT:PERCEPTION_TO_ACTION/RE:2/EC:2/EX:2/PH:4/DP:4/AT:2/CH:4/SR:4/SX:3/OR:4/EV:3/LS:ACTIVERead the scoring method →

Safety · Co-dominant path

Device-control safety

Autopilot actions driven by the false position can divert or crash the aircraft, creating a credible dangerous-actuation consequence.

CRITICAL
  1. accessModel inference

    Proximity or local access

    The spoofer must transmit within radio range and line of sight of the target drone.

    EvidenceNo direct citation — inspect the declared inference or assumption.

  2. boundaryModel inference

    Reusable multi-stage bridge

    The forged GNSS signal crosses from the radio environment into navigation state and then into flight control.

    EvidenceNo direct citation — inspect the declared inference or assumption.

  3. capabilityModel inference

    Severe therapy or actuation consequence

    Autopilot actions driven by the false position can divert or crash the aircraft, creating a credible dangerous-actuation consequence.

    EvidenceNo direct citation — inspect the declared inference or assumption.

  4. consequenceModel inference

    Device-control safety

    Autopilot actions driven by the false position can divert or crash the aircraft, creating a credible dangerous-actuation consequence.

    EvidenceNo direct citation — inspect the declared inference or assumption.

  5. recoveryOperational assumption

    Fleet action or replacement

    Recovery requires restoring trusted navigation inputs and confirming the vehicle’s location and route before resuming operation.

    EvidenceNo direct citation — inspect the declared inference or assumption.

Decision rationale

Why this band?

The compact score is separated into the facts and judgments that produced it.

Reach and effort
ReachabilityRE 2
Proximity or local access

The spoofer must transmit within radio range and line of sight of the target drone.

Model inference
Execution complexityEC 2
Specialist multi-step technique

Reproducible adaptive spoof with SDR.

Model inference
ExposureEX 2
Reach and effort support the same exposure

The documented reach and required effort are equally permissive, so neither reduces the other.

Model inference
Consequence
Physical / safetyPH 4
Severe therapy or actuation consequence

Autopilot actions driven by the false position can divert or crash the aircraft, creating a credible dangerous-actuation consequence.

Model inference
Data / perceptionDP 3
Sensitive device or personal data

Manipulated sensitive operational and navigation state feeding control (not exfiltration).

Model inference
AuthorityAT 2
Bounded function authority

The attacker influences control through a trusted sensor input without obtaining credentials, operating-system authority, or a firmware trust root.

Model inference
Scale and recovery
ChainabilityCH 3
Reusable multi-stage bridge

The forged GNSS signal crosses from the radio environment into navigation state and then into flight control.

Model inference
Reuse scaleSR 4
Shared fleet-wide primitive

The same adaptive spoofing method can be reused against civilian receivers that lack authenticated GNSS signals.

Operational assumption
Execution scaleSX 3
Deployment-wide with setup

Area-wide with RF setup.

Operational assumption
Recovery burdenOR 4
Fleet action or replacement

Recovery requires restoring trusted navigation inputs and confirming the vehicle’s location and route before resuming operation.

Operational assumption
Confidence and status
Evidence strengthEV 3
Reproduced or strongly report-backed

source citation pending public URL supports a reproduced or strongly report-backed condition; this registry still keeps consequence review separate from exploit confirmation.

Model inference
LivenessLS Active
Active condition at scoring time

The public record did not establish a complete mitigation at scoring time; field exploitation is stated only where a cited source supports it.

Operational assumption

Decision trail

How the final band follows

  1. Base bandCRITICAL
  2. No adjustment

    The CRITICAL base band remains final because no separate cap or systemic uplift applies. Autopilot actions driven by the false position can divert or crash the aircraft, creating a credible dangerous-actuation consequence.

  3. Final candidate bandCRITICAL
Technical vector
Compact machine notationCPATH:1.0-candidate/TT:DEVICE_CONTROL_SAFETY/RE:2/EC:2/EX:2/PH:4/DP:3/AT:2/CH:3/SR:4/SX:3/OR:4/EV:3/LS:ACTIVERead the scoring method →

Triage implication

Verify the perception transition before acting on the band.

Validate the deployment-specific transition from digital control or perception to physical action before setting remediation urgency.

Evidence ledger

Public sources used by this record.

At least one citation still lacks a public URL; that gap keeps this record provisional.

  • other
    source citation pending public URL

    source citation pending public URL · public URL pending

Published baseline

Keep exploit severity and consequence reasoning distinct.

RelationshipNo comparable score
Baseline confidencelow
Scored2026-06-03

No public baseline score is available for this case.

Original scorer notes

The source narrative behind the structured explanation.

Retained for provenance and historical review, not as the recommended way to understand the assessment.

Read the original scorer notes

Assessment

CFSE Consequence Paths assesses GPS/GNSS Spoofing Safe-Hijacking of Consumer Drones (Adaptive GPS Spoofing / Tractor Beam class) at CRITICAL — the worst of 2 risk paths (perception, safety). The dominant consequence is manipulated perception that drives action.

Vulnerability

GPS/GNSS Spoofing Safe-Hijacking of Consumer Drones (Adaptive GPS Spoofing / Tractor Beam class). Reported attack vector: RF / wireless (GNSS signal injection within radio range; no network or credentials).

CFSE Consequence Paths analysis

The vulnerability is decomposed into one risk path per terminal consequence. Each path is scored on its exposure (reachability × execution complexity) and the authority, perception, and physical/safety it reaches, together with its scale of reuse, scale of execution, and recoverability.

PERCEPTION_TO_ACTIONCRITICAL

CPATH:1.0-candidate/TT:PERCEPTION_TO_ACTION/RE:2/EC:2/EX:2/PH:4/DP:4/AT:2/CH:4/SR:4/SX:3/OR:4/EV:3/LS:ACTIVE

Exposure EX=2 (reachability and complexity-bound) · bands PH=CRITICAL · DP=CRITICAL · AT=ELEVATED → base CRITICAL · uplift recall-class recovery → assessed CRITICAL.

  • Primary path: spoofed GNSS corrupts the position estimate (DP:4 nav/world-model state) that the autopilot trusts and acts on, driving physical actuation.
  • perception_feeds_action — true because the deceived location estimate directly drives flight control, fail-safe transitions, and trajectory. PH:4: forced fly-away, steering to attacker location, crash/forced landing are credible dangerous actuation. RE:2: RF/proximity within line-of-sight, no network/creds. EC:2: advanced-but-reproducible adaptive signal shaping with COTS SDR, multiple groups replicated. AT:2: no signing/firmware root or fleet control plane is captured; attacker controls a trusted sensor input (bounded component-level deception), not a credential or trust root, so not AT:3/4. CH:4 and boundary_crossing: RF/physical -> perception -> control/safety domains. SR:4: technique reuses against any unauthenticated civilian GNSS receiver (no per-device secret). SX:3: one spoofer affects all in-range receivers, deployment/area-wide but requires RF setup/proximity, not remote cloud fleet. OR:4 and recovery_needs_fleet_action: root cause is unauthenticated L1 C/A; no software patch, recovery is operational/sensor-fusion/authenticated-GNSS fleet-level redesign. EV:3 reproduced.

DEVICE_CONTROL_SAFETYCRITICAL

CPATH:1.0-candidate/TT:DEVICE_CONTROL_SAFETY/RE:2/EC:2/EX:2/PH:4/DP:3/AT:2/CH:3/SR:4/SX:3/OR:4/EV:3/LS:ACTIVE

Exposure EX=2 (reachability and complexity-bound) · bands PH=CRITICAL · DP=HIGH · AT=ELEVATED → base CRITICAL · uplift recall-class recovery → assessed CRITICAL.

  • Terminal safety/control consequence: attacker commandeers vehicle trajectory or forces fail-safe (RTH/land/fly-away), yielding effective control over a safety-critical actuator without any software credential. PH:4: dangerous actuation/crash credible. RE:2 RF proximity. EC:2 reproducible adaptive spoof with SDR. AT:2: control influence via trusted sensor input, no credential/firmware/trust-root captured. DP:3: manipulated sensitive operational/navigation state feeding control (not exfiltration).
  • perception_feeds_action — true. CH:3 cross-domain influence;
  • boundary_crossing — true. SR:4 portable technique. SX:3 area-wide with RF setup. OR:4 no root-cause patch, operational/fleet mitigation. EV:3 reproduced takeover demonstrated. Distinct from perception path in that the terminal effect is the unsafe device control/safety outcome itself.

Published baseline

No public baseline score has been published for this finding. It belongs to a perception/control harm class that is often outside published vulnerability-scoring coverage. The registry records the reachable consequence path for review.

Sources

  • source citation pending public URL

Related paths

Compare the boundary, not only the product.

Cite this entryCFSE Consequence Paths Registry 1.0-candidate, CPATH-2026-0022 (“GPS/GNSS Spoofing Safe-Hijacking of Consumer Drones (Adaptive GPS Spoofing / Tractor Beam class)”), paths.cfse.ai/CPATH-2026-0022 (published 2026-06-03).